borsht

All-Star Author
Oakland
Posts:774 Points:185,905 Joined:Aug 2012
|
Message Posted: Apr 27, 2013 1:34:19 PM
The EPA needs to focus on real issues' They mandate that by 2025 we must meet 54mpg. Also they want to mandate oxygenated fuel. If they decide to push for E85, they surely will not get 54mpg. It appears more and more that the inmates are running the asylum.
|
mdr46

Rookie Author
Maryland
Posts:82 Points:56,225 Joined:Jan 2013
|
Message Posted: Apr 25, 2013 1:28:08 PM
I'd like to know how the EPA comes up with these MPG numbers. Do they really think that everyone wants to drive around a small econobox? It may be possible to get 40MPG with a small lightweight vehicle, but what about a larger heavy vehicle like a truck that needs a larger engine for carrying payload or towing? Good luck trying to get 40MPG from that.
|
Donatelo

Champion Author
Dayton
Posts:1,115 Points:290,865 Joined:Apr 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 24, 2013 8:18:22 AM
change all diesel engines over to natural gas(propane), and use our own resources. converting a diesel to run propane is a fairly easy process, we have plenty of natural gas reserves if we also use what we have on public lands.
|
99dakota

Champion Author
Providence
Posts:8,087 Points:2,168,025 Joined:Oct 2006
|
Message Posted: Apr 24, 2013 4:42:26 AM
There is plenty of oil out there... We just need to go out and get it!
|
Bttlecat

All-Star Author
Oklahoma City
Posts:709 Points:82,675 Joined:Jan 2013
|
Message Posted: Apr 22, 2013 11:52:53 PM
"shift our cars and trucks off oil for good." How about shifting this nation out of reverse and put it into a forward gear?
|
priver

Veteran Author
Alberta
Posts:403 Points:33,435 Joined:Apr 2013
|
Message Posted: Apr 21, 2013 7:32:02 AM
never say never
|
131rnmom

Rookie Author
Pittsburgh
Posts:9 Points:273,760 Joined:Mar 2012
|
Message Posted: Feb 24, 2013 11:16:52 PM
We must have 4wheel drive vehicles to get in and out of our access driveway. 9 out of 16 of the vehicles owed by neighbors are 4wh drive. We get. 11-13 miles per gallon. The new mandated 54mpg would be a blessing but thats only for the types of cars that prevent us from actually reaching home. Would be nice if 4wh drive vehicles were included!
|
paulweb

All-Star Author
Ohio
Posts:806 Points:353,270 Joined:May 2011
|
Message Posted: Feb 24, 2013 9:16:09 AM
EPA mandates fuel standards; but will the vehicles be as safe as today?
|
Mypennygas

Rookie Author
Sarasota
Posts:4 Points:180 Joined:Sep 2012
|
Message Posted: Feb 22, 2013 6:47:04 PM
Hey Guys mypennygas.com is doing a free gas giveaway tonight.
|
fuzzyscout

Rookie Author
Virginia
Posts:63 Points:309,250 Joined:May 2011
|
Message Posted: Feb 22, 2013 7:35:50 AM
You can only predict events after they've happened. -- Eugene Ionesco
|
sonicmustang

All-Star Author
Alberta
Posts:637 Points:149,375 Joined:Dec 2010
|
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 10:41:44 PM
Too bad
|
hskerven

Rookie Author
Wisconsin
Posts:79 Points:48,205 Joined:Jan 2013
|
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 9:36:53 PM
They could of been making more fuel efficient cars 20 years ago but every ones to busy Jackn each other off
|
phpearso

Sophomore Author
Indiana
Posts:109 Points:132,270 Joined:Mar 2004
|
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 5:26:20 PM
***Are you saying 53% of the adults in this country are idiots?***
Hmmmm.... Getting warmer.
|
phpearso

Sophomore Author
Indiana
Posts:109 Points:132,270 Joined:Mar 2004
|
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 5:23:44 PM
by 2025 we should not need to get 54 mpg.!
|
thorman52

Veteran Author
South Bend
Posts:388 Points:40,050 Joined:Jan 2009
|
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 3:42:14 PM
So, what's the bottom line? We want vehicles that get 100 mpg and want to pay 50 cents a gallon. Ain't gonna happen. The price at the pump will never see an average of $3.00 a gallon or lower ever again. As vehicles become more fuel efficient and the supply of oil steadily decrease, demand decreases and prices will increase.
The reasons for high gas prices are many and complicated. Like blaming the President, regardless of who's in the White House at the time. Some in this forum blame the current President for everything that is going wrong in the USA today (and refuse to see what's going right). If that were true wouldn’t he have been impeached a long time ago? If that were true how did he get re-elected? Are you saying 53% of the adults in this country are idiots? Quite a claim.
Blaming Congress is closer but even Congress doesn't wave any magic wand to control prices. But they do legislate or ignore legislation that affects the price of gas. Get the big oil lobbyists away from Capitol Hill and maybe Congress will act in the best interests of the people who elected them rather than lining their pockets and those of big oil.
Blame the EPA. One poster stated that they pull figures out of thin air. How ridiculous can you get? I'm confident that the EPA has very competent engineers doing the math. Their mission is to monitor, compile facts and figures, and enforcement that can affect the gas mileage of vehicles. Then when Congress passes legislation the EPA will enforce that legislation. They have no independent input on what you pay at the pump. Seems some people need to educate themselves as to how the government works and who has what responsibilities. “A little bit of knowledge is a dangerous thing.”
|
GatorGuy

Champion Author
Columbia
Posts:2,220 Points:1,202,985 Joined:Jan 2009
|
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 1:50:29 PM
Yeah, I never thought that was realistic...even if it was achievable it would make vehicles too costly to where nobody could afford one.
|
lyanMI

Veteran Author
Detroit
Posts:260 Points:208,345 Joined:May 2012
|
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 1:28:12 PM
I have my doubts too.
|
EMoe57

Champion Author
Jacksonville
Posts:4,592 Points:1,011,065 Joined:Apr 2009
|
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 11:15:00 AM
Can't reach it if you don't even try!
|
briandbec

Champion Author
Tucson
Posts:4,219 Points:495,890 Joined:Aug 2011
|
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 9:15:11 AM
54mpg (EPA stds are not the window-sticker stds - they tend to create bigger numbers from the same results) is entirely achievable. But it means we as a nation have to get used to taking longer than 12 sec to get from 0-60 mph.
If they put a 1.4L turbo diesel in a Camry today, it would get 54mpg pretty easily. It would be so slow no one would buy it.
|
sleuth696

All-Star Author
Ventura
Posts:918 Points:197,940 Joined:Oct 2012
|
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 9:14:20 AM
Refreshing to see someone from EPA tell the truth. Unfortunately, he'll be gone because he didn't toe the line.
|
bridgerunner

Champion Author
Virginia
Posts:4,767 Points:1,002,835 Joined:Jul 2009
|
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 9:13:36 AM
Not gonna happen!
|
badharley

Champion Author
Tampa
Posts:1,010 Points:737,285 Joined:Jul 2010
|
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 9:13:32 AM
Won't be able to afford a new car then.
|
rual817

Sophomore Author
Dallas
Posts:112 Points:160,035 Joined:Nov 2011
|
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 9:12:00 AM
What we need to do is get away from gasoline and use a more efficient diesel. Diesel produces more BTU than gasoline. I drive a 2000 VW Jetta TDI new only produced 90hp, but LOTS of low end torque which helps pulling and take-off. I get a combined 37.3mpg (34c-41h) on 50+ tanks (tracked by fuelly.com). VW current 2.0 TDI produces about the same numbers, or very slightly better Fuel Economy and better HP/Torque. VW just unveiled their NEW 1.6 TDI, which the HP/Torque will fall between the 1.9 and 2.0, and will blow the doors off EVERTHING with their Fuel Economy. Tested @ 74mpg combined. That makes it mid 60’s city /low 80’s highway. This is NOT a hybrid, but a full Diesel set-up, and today’s diesel cars are quieter than they used to be. Yes… Diesel is more per gallon, but when you factor Fuel Economy, mine is cheaper than most gas cars. At current prices, $3.699 gas / $3.999 diesel, here are the numbers. $3.999 / 37.3mpg = $0.1072 per mile, on diesel ( 37.3/$3.999= 9.3 miles per dollar ) $3.699 / 34.5mpg = $0.1072 per mile, on gas. ( 34.5/$3.699= 9.3 miles per dollar ) So unless you are getting better than 34.5 combined mpg, the diesel is cheaper to drive per mile. $3.699 / 20mpg = $0.185 per mile on gas. ( 20/$3.699= 5.4 miles per dollar ) Want to compare this to a hybrid?? My car HAS pulled a broken down 96 Chevy Asto Van loaded with mechanics tool's. I work part time as mechanic and work for this guy from time to time. His engine quit after 372k on his Mobile Mechanic Van. I pulled him home and his van grossed 7k+. I don't think a Prius could do that.
|
DimitrisIL

Champion Author
Chicago
Posts:1,496 Points:519,275 Joined:Feb 2011
|
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 9:11:15 AM
It's only 2013 and there are already cars that get 35-40mps (not hybrids). 50-55mps by 2025 is more than doable. They have more than 10-12 years to achive it.
|
vrossi46

Champion Author
San Jose
Posts:2,652 Points:800,920 Joined:Oct 2008
|
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 9:10:54 AM
i sure have my doubts
|
Number43

Champion Author
Lexington
Posts:8,672 Points:1,634,110 Joined:Oct 2008
|
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 9:09:57 AM
I wouldn't want one of those junk piles. Let them kill someone else's family. I'll keep my older bigger heavier safer car.
|
emernal

Champion Author
St. Louis
Posts:6,922 Points:2,010,070 Joined:Mar 2004
|
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 9:09:29 AM
Depends on how much gas prices continue to go up as economy improves.
|
Toppers

Champion Author
Atlanta
Posts:8,987 Points:2,465,720 Joined:Mar 2005
|
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 9:07:30 AM
Probably a good if we just get close...
|
oldforger

Veteran Author
Calgary
Posts:399 Points:351,105 Joined:Jan 2012
|
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 9:06:45 AM
safety is a real matter
|
rippinusoff

Champion Author
Lexington
Posts:7,383 Points:1,483,775 Joined:May 2007
|
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 9:06:35 AM
I want my "Obama" gas card...
|
Rainy1

All-Star Author
San Diego
Posts:543 Points:57,930 Joined:Apr 2012
|
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 9:05:48 AM
Just give me a free gas card for life!!!!
|
tomok

Champion Author
Portland
Posts:32,907 Points:2,341,510 Joined:Aug 2006
|
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 9:05:43 AM
U.S. is not likely to reach mandated 54 mpg by 2025, that sounds about right. There is a trade off for high vehicle mpg and the cost of that vehicle. The higher the vehicle mpg, the more that vehicle will cost. With the current economy, how many people can afford one? The higher the vehicle mpg, the less fuel bought and sold, the more fuel will cost. There are a variety of vehicle fuels available now, gasoline, diesel, electricity, natural gas, hydrogen, ethanol or a combination of fuels to power the vehicle. If not the previous fuels, what will replace them? High mpg vehicle? A light weight vehicle with a high fuel efficent engine? An enclosed motorcycle? 'Coming out of the closet' Sneeky's lousy, smoke and mirrors, lack of jobs, dog and pony show and in the crapper economy, the jobs are Not here. Sneeky's economy is not improving but continues to hurt the population and the job numbers continue to be down! NO More spending gone wild, there has to be a limit! Four long years before this country's economy will ever begin to recover. Drive vehicles with high MPG, are very safe, reliable, have a ‘reasonable’ cost and a good ‘value’ for the money. The price of fuel at the pump is too high!
|
ramgas

Champion Author
Texas
Posts:2,155 Points:1,298,305 Joined:Jan 2005
|
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 9:05:34 AM
Oil lobby too powerful.
|
matman01

Champion Author
Detroit
Posts:14,812 Points:1,955,860 Joined:May 2007
|
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 9:05:27 AM
What a crock...the EPA is a joke!
|
AriesMMD

Champion Author
Sacramento
Posts:1,476 Points:408,440 Joined:Dec 2011
|
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 9:03:56 AM
They don't want to change from a semi-efficient drive train to a political toy?
|
LuckyD43

Champion Author
Long Island
Posts:31,950 Points:2,163,095 Joined:Apr 2005
|
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 9:02:15 AM
I never considered that 54 mpg goal to be realistic anyway. The 40 mpg estimate sounds more plausible because there are some cars today already getting 30+. With today's technology, I believe it is possible to get 40 mpg by 2025.
|
rrs517

All-Star Author
Colorado
Posts:903 Points:339,730 Joined:Apr 2006
|
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 9:02:07 AM
Old News
|
gafgar

Champion Author
Detroit
Posts:1,043 Points:325,490 Joined:Feb 2012
|
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 9:01:55 AM
maybe they could just claim that their vehs get better mpg than they do, just like now.
|
liao

Champion Author
Montreal
Posts:3,427 Points:1,424,235 Joined:Sep 2008
|
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 9:01:43 AM
Try harder.
|
shea33

Champion Author
Pensacola
Posts:2,343 Points:538,715 Joined:Oct 2011
|
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 9:01:15 AM
Nothing we didn't know when the statment was made.
|
Neely8

Veteran Author
Boston
Posts:434 Points:96,500 Joined:Feb 2013
|
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 9:00:55 AM
Won't happen because the auto manufacturers don't want to spend the extra money, even though it will be better for our environment.
|
goalie1950

Champion Author
Phoenix
Posts:6,385 Points:1,291,445 Joined:Oct 2009
|
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 8:59:04 AM
No real surprise here. Just another empty policy from the Obummer administration that has no future of being successful.
|
vcsuksu21

Champion Author
Oklahoma City
Posts:2,468 Points:703,680 Joined:Dec 2010
|
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 8:58:55 AM
i expected that, I guess I qualify as an EPA Engineer
|
gsofrs

Champion Author
Greensboro
Posts:4,128 Points:1,212,565 Joined:Apr 2009
|
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 8:53:50 AM
Lofty goal to begin with.
|
ZeroBoxes

Champion Author
Mississippi
Posts:1,064 Points:209,565 Joined:Apr 2012
|
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 8:52:26 AM
Uhm… educated civil servants with comb-overs and Dunlap disease.
|
F81M

Champion Author
Indiana
Posts:1,473 Points:782,160 Joined:Aug 2008
|
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 8:52:07 AM
He won't be there long if he keeps saying stuff like that!!
|
geezrtek

Champion Author
Michigan
Posts:1,886 Points:427,735 Joined:Apr 2011
|
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 8:52:03 AM
Old
|
bbthegun

Champion Author
San Diego
Posts:5,968 Points:1,677,115 Joined:Sep 2006
|
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 8:51:58 AM
nordlead - while your point about EPA needing engineers is a salient point why is it the EPA sides with leftist junk science nuts 95% of the time then? Doesn't sound like they listen to their own engineers or their engineers are so incompetent that they can't get a private sector job.
Don't worry, I'm not picking on the EPA here, most government workers (>50%) can't get a private sector job either. They aren't smart enough nor have the work ethic to make it.
|
livedream

Champion Author
Michigan
Posts:3,664 Points:751,060 Joined:Mar 2011
|
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 8:50:23 AM
I'm not surprised. I will definitely buy an EV before 54 mpg is ever reached.
|
dieselfiendSC

Champion Author
South Carolina
Posts:2,170 Points:842,305 Joined:Nov 2008
|
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 8:50:08 AM
Wow, I would not have guessed, but now that an EPA engineer says so we should listen.
|